RCR & Scholarly Activity In-Person Training

Introduction

Why is UK mandating RCR training?

“As a public institution of higher education, public confidence in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) by faculty, staff and students is critical. We must promote and maintain a culture that is supported by an infrastructure that educates and assists in the ethical conduct of research.”

Lisa Cassis PhD, UK Vice President for Research (VPR)

UK has had research misconduct cases in the past few years due to a failure of some researchers to follow Responsible Conduct of Research.

This effects:

  • The reputation of UK and its researchers;
  • Researchers/research personnel affiliated with the wrongdoer;
  • Personnel managing the process for research misconduct;
  • Researchers doing honest work that could have received the research funding used;
  • General public if faulty data is used in publications is relied upon by the medical community, product development, etc.

Areas of RCR Training at UK

  • Mentoring
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Peer Review
  • Research Misconduct
  • Data Management
  • Safe Work Environments
  • Reproducibility

What Will The Rest of the Day Look Like?

  • Observe 3 case studies
  • Discuss in groups
  • Summarize key points

Must have minimum 1 hour of contact together

Case Study One

Peer Review

In this session, learners will consider the implication of unethical conduct in the peer review process.

Through this case, learners will:

  • learn about ethical conduct during the peer-review process
  • learn how to manage conflicts of interest and bias related to the peer-review process

Case Study #1

Discussion

  1. Sum up the general problem presented in the scenario.
  2. Did Lisa act appropriately in telling Bill to publish quickly?
  3. Did Lisa act appropriately in delaying the review? In giving a critical and demanding review of the paper?
  4. Is there anything Lisa should have done differently when she received the submitted paper?
  5. Did Bill act unethically in this scenario? What should Bill have done when given the encouragement to publish?

Additional Resources

Case Study Two

Research Misconduct

In this session, learners will explore research misconduct.

Through this case, learners will:

  • learn about research misconduct
  • learn about available resources regarding misconduct at the university

Case Study #2

Discussion

  1. Sum up the general problem presented in the scenario.
  2. What should the graduate student (GS) do in this situation?
  3. What are the possible outcomes?
  4. Are the possible benefits of remaining silent greater than the potential fallout if someone else figures out that research misconduct occurred?
  5. If you were in this situation, who would you talk to for advice or report your suspicions?

Additional Resources

Case Study Three

Mentoring / Safe Work Environment

In this session, learners will learn about harassment and methods for reporting this misconduct at the University.

Through this case, learners will:

  • learn about harassment
  • consider how to respond to harassment issues
  • learn how to report harassment at the University

Case Study #3

Discussion

  1. What are the issues raised by this case?
  2. What should Nicole do? If her PI is unwilling to meet, is there anyone else she can contact to try and resolve the situation?
  3. What are ways you can help prevent harassment in academia?

Additional Resources

Feedback

Reflect

  • What were your big takeaways from the training today?
  • What lingering questions do you still have regarding the content?
  • How might you improve this training specifically for CI faculty and staff in the future?

Case Studies

Post-session RCR Case Study Survey - https://uky.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_79CaFBt2jglwtMi

Thank you!!